Re:How often do full-body MRIs find cancer?
by jb1991 on Sunday February 15, 2026 @05:21AM
(#47022612)
Additional diagnostics can also be very expensive. Articles like this don’t seem to understand the overall costs to a health system with decisions like these. And that cost eventually does go down into the pockets of patients one way or another.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How often do full-body MRIs find cancer?
by blackcatsec on Sunday February 15, 2026 @05:46AM
(#47022730)
I think the point of the conversation is that if we take the predatory capitalism out of the way, using MRIs could potentially be a net benefit overall for everyone.
Re:How often do full-body MRIs find cancer?
by randallsquared on Sunday February 15, 2026 @09:34AM
(#47024001)
OECD data (most recent available, around 2020–2022): MRI units per 100K population: United States ~3.6, Canada ~1.0, United Kingdom ~0.7
I would argue that getting "predatory capitalism" out of the way has sharply curtailed MRI availability where that's been tried. Maybe we should loosen the leash on capitalism a bit to get better care...
Re:How often do full-body MRIs find cancer?
by n8henrie on Sunday February 15, 2026 @09:40AM
(#47024051)
I'd argue that malpractice risk has at least as much negative influence on a physicians judgment.
It's perceived as much less (medico-legally) risky to "do something" (or more often "refer the patient to someone else to do something") than not do something.