Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss
by johnnyanmac on Friday February 13, 2026 @08:13PM
(#47010246)
The 0.90 century old economicists were discussing the idea.
https://www.npr.org/2015/08/13/432122637/keynes-predicted-we...
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss
by tim333 on Saturday February 14, 2026 @06:16AM
(#47013599)
Keynes was a different thing - that we could cut working hours to 15 a week rather than never have to work again. I think that would be quite possible with a drop of living standards - you could do it today by moving somewhere cheap and doing some remote work. I think it didn't happen due to human nature. We both quite like doing something useful with our time and like increasing living standards.
I inherited some money and don't need to work, but do work on stuff because I like doing it. I imagine that's what things will be like post agi.
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss
by RevEng on Saturday February 14, 2026 @01:22PM
(#47016919)
Be careful not to conflate AGI with the current generative AI revolution. Even if it may eventually lead to AGI, it is quite a way from that and the social implications of the current and near term AI is what we are talking about. We can only imagine what this will be like post AGI, but we have some idea of what shifts happen when a technology comes along that greatly amplifies human labor.
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss
by int_19h on Sunday February 15, 2026 @07:50PM
(#47029523)
Post-scarcity utopia was not an uncommon thing in mid-20th-century sci-fi, especially when you also include Soviet Bloc countries.
Re:Why I'm not worried about AI job loss
by RevEng on Saturday February 14, 2026 @01:17PM
(#47016878)
Do a search for "the 20 hour work week". You will find plenty of articles from the 50s and 60s talking about how technology is going to make it so we don't have to work anymore. Popular Science was particularly keen on this but they certainly weren't the only ones.
I'm 0.6 centuries old and have never heard that said for existing tech. Human level AI could presumably do human work by definition but that's not the case before we get that, including now.