Re:The Baby-Eating Aliens
by nazgulnarsil on Friday February 06, 2009 @12:17PM
(#469981)
right but we aren't fitness maximizers. we're adaptation executors.
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/11/adaptation-exec.html
for instance: we adapted to an environment of scarcity. now that we live in an environment of plenty a lot of people get fat. they can't turn off the adaptation to favor fatty sugary foods just because the environment has changed. similarly when encountering aliens adaptations that evolved to help us socialize with our own species may lead us to having strong opinions about the moral systems of said aliens. strong enough to take significant action.
This is a good point, but I would expect (the more evolved) human beings in the future to be closer to being fitness maximizers.
Re:The Baby-Eating Aliens
by michaelkeenan on Friday February 06, 2009 @12:37PM
(#470015)
They've been bio-engineered, not evolved. The bio-engineers presumably cared more about maintaining human morality than about fitness-maximizing. So they kept the "human morality applies beyond humans" value.
Re:The Baby-Eating Aliens
by daniel-cussen on Saturday February 07, 2009 @01:59AM
(#470889)
I logged in just to vote you up.
This is going to sound like an ad hominem attack, but it seems to me that a majority of the singularity/futurist crowd are more concerned with impressing others with shows of intelligence than any other goal. They sound more like a bunch of male apes strutting around vying for alpha status, perhaps not surprising given that they are almost all male. A comment very much like mine (about the pointlessness of feeling compassion for crystal bugs) was posted on the overcoming bias blog but it received no replies/rebuttals. Rather the comments over there simply accepted the premises of the story without question. I have a great deal of respect for Elizer but his followers are frighteningly cult like.