"Seeing LLM-signals" == "reading shallowly", so I think I covered that case.
Or you're writing for the people who haven't deluded themselves into thinking that they're magical LLM detectors, which definitely does seem like a win.
Re:ai;dr
by lelanthran on Friday February 13, 2026 @02:52AM
(#47000091)
> Or you're writing for the people who haven't deluded themselves into thinking that they're magical LLM detectors, which definitely does seem like a win.
What delusion? The false positive rate just on HN alone is so low it's not even a rounding error.
No, you are writing for people who see LLM-signals and read on anyway.
Not sure that that's a win for you.