Re:Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan launches dark-money group to i...
by ethbr1 on Tuesday February 17, 2026 @10:23PM
(#47056764)
There's a fundamental difference between allowing an unlimited amount of opaque money to support arbitrary political campaigns and buying a media company.
The latter does business under its name, is regulated by the FCC, and if publicly traded has financial disclosure requirements.
The former is effectively anonymous, unregulated, and has no requirement to disclose any of its finances.
If folks want post-Citizens, fine -- just require public, transparent disclosure of what individuals are spending on political speech, above a floor ($10,000?).
You think you are reducing the influence of the rich, but you are actually just raising the price of entry. A millionaire can donate to a PAC and buy TV ads, but a billionaire can buy or start a newspaper, TV station, or social media network. What are you going to do then, tell the newspapers what they are allowed to print?