News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The most dangerous code in the world by grannyg00se on Wednesday October 24, 2012 @10:47PM (#4696123)
I would say that by having the default be the safer option, the API is in line with that philosophy.

It takes more effort to override the default and shoot yourself in the foot.

Granted, it could be better. I guess that strange option could be a completely separate command parameter with a very obvious name. Then again, it's such a strange behaviour, maybe it just shouldn't even be an option at all.

Re:The most dangerous code in the world by crawfordcomeaux on Wednesday October 24, 2012 @11:09PM (#4696187)
The effort it takes to do something that's unsafe should be laborious and not simply require adding a single line of code.

This API doesn't fit with the philosophy because it takes a negligible amount of work to walk down the unsafe path.