News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Opus 4.6 by itay-maman on Thursday February 05, 2026 @02:05PM (#46903572)
agree on that and the speed is fantastic with them, and also that the dynamics of questioning the current session's assumptions has gotten way better.

yet - given an existing codebase (even not huge) they often won't suggest "we need to restructure this part differently to solve this bug". Instead they tend to push forward.

Re:Claude Opus 4.6 by jorl17 on Thursday February 05, 2026 @02:14PM (#46903711)
You are right, agreed.

Having realized that, perhaps you are right that we may need a different architecture. Time will tell!