News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:GPT-5.3-Codex by nocman on Thursday February 05, 2026 @02:07PM (#46903615)
> Who are making these claims? script kiddies? sr devs? Altman?

AI agents, perhaps? :-D

Re:GPT-5.3-Codex by locknitpicker on Thursday February 05, 2026 @02:03PM (#46903550)
> All anonymous as well. Who are making these claims? script kiddies? sr devs? Altman?

You can take off your tinfoil hat. The same models can perform differently depending on the programming language, frameworks and libraries employed, and even project. Also, context does matter, and a model's output greatly varies depending on your prompt history.

Re:GPT-5.3-Codex by andrepd on Thursday February 05, 2026 @03:05PM (#46904441)
It's hardly tinfoil to understand that companies riding a multi-trillion dollar funding wave would spend a few pennies astroturfing their shit on hn. Or overfit to benchmarks that people take as objective measurements.
Re:GPT-5.3-Codex by BoredPositron on Thursday February 05, 2026 @01:55PM (#46903405)
When you keep his ramblings on twitter or company blog in mind I bet he is a shit poster here.