News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Data centers in space makes no sense by habinero on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @07:41AM (#46885151)
No, they didn't. You can't "send away" thermal energy via radio waves. At the temperatures we're talking about, thermal energy is in the infrared. That's blackbody radiation.
Re:Data centers in space makes no sense by mortehu on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @08:25AM (#46885556)
Your answer makes it seem like you too missed the point. If a Starlink sends a 1000W signal to Earth, that is 1000W of power that does not heat the satellite.
Re:Data centers in space makes no sense by nosianu on Friday February 06, 2026 @02:45PM (#46917243)
No YOU missed the point.

The creation of that 1000W requires additional hardware and power, and only a part will be available for the transmission. The rest will be additional heat that has to be gotten rid of.

Re:Data centers in space makes no sense by adrian_b on Wednesday February 04, 2026 @10:01AM (#46886630)
You missed the point.

Nobody describes a satellite by specifying the amount of heat that it produces, but by the amount of electrical energy that it consumes.

In a communication satellite, a large fraction of the consumed electrical energy goes into the radio transmitter. Radio transmitters are very efficient and most of the consumed power is emitted as radio waves and only a very small part is converted into heat, which must be handled by the cooling system.

So in any communication satellite, a significant fraction of the consumed energy does not become heat.