News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Qwen3-Coder-Next. Parent comment

Re:Qwen3-Coder-Next by vessenes on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @11:16AM (#46872935)
I'm thinking the next step would be to include this as a 'junior dev' and let Opus farm simple stuff out to it. It could be local, but also if it's on cerebras, it could be realllly fast.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Qwen3-Coder-Next by ttoinou on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @11:19AM (#46872973)
Cerebras already has GLM 4.7 in the code plans
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Qwen3-Coder-Next by vessenes on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @11:22AM (#46873015)
Yep. But this is like 10x faster; 3B active parameters.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Qwen3-Coder-Next by ttoinou on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @11:33AM (#46873186)
Cerebras is already 200-800 tps, do you need even faster ?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Qwen3-Coder-Next by overfeed on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @12:28PM (#46874008)
Yes! I don't try to read agent tokens as they are generated, so if code generation decreases from 1 minute to 6 seconds, I'll be delighted. I'll even accept 10s -> 1s speedups. Considering how often I've seen agents spin wheels with different approaches, faster is always better, until models can 1-shot solutions without the repeated "No, wait..." / "Actually..." thinking loops
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Qwen3-Coder-Next by pqtyw on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @04:13PM (#46877377)
> until models can 1-shot solutions without the repeated "No, wait..." / "Actually..." thinking loops

That would imply they'd have to be actually smarter than humans, not just faster and be able to scale infinitely. IMHO that's still very far away..

[ Parent | on HN ]