News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wayland (X11 replacement) 1.0 Officially Released by raverbashing on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @03:37AM (#4686989)
X over SSH in my experience is much harder to configure, and slower

Some people claim it depends on adequately configuring X, which may be true, but it's much easier to configure VNC over SSH to have an acceptable performance

Re:Wayland (X11 replacement) 1.0 Officially Released by SeppoErviala on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @06:16AM (#4687385)
I think the main argument for remote X is that it is so easy to use between 2 true X11 environments. You just `ssh -X` to your target and start running programs.

On Windows or OSX though... If you were going to install X11 why not skip it and just install VNC?

Re:Wayland (X11 replacement) 1.0 Officially Released by w0utert on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @07:00AM (#4687499)
Maybe I don't want to run a full X session on my remote machine, just to run a simple X client and have it displayed on my local desktop?

VNC is no alternative for running individual applications remotely. Remote desktop != remote X.

Re:Wayland (X11 replacement) 1.0 Officially Released by raverbashing on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @08:16AM (#4687677)
True, for one app, ssh -X is usually better

Still, most of the time, running only one application is not the usage model. Or it's a simple thing that doesn't need X, just ssh

Re:Wayland (X11 replacement) 1.0 Officially Released by ygra on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @12:42PM (#4688869)
Remote desktop allows remoting only single applications, though. That's how stuff like the XP mode with Virtual PC on Windows 7 works.
Re:Wayland (X11 replacement) 1.0 Officially Released by ansible on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @07:52AM (#4687607)
That's exactly what 'ssh -X' is for.
Re:Wayland (X11 replacement) 1.0 Officially Released by mercurial on Tuesday October 23, 2012 @08:21AM (#4687695)
(But tastes much better as 'ssh -XC')