Re:RCC: A boundary theory explaining why LLMs hallucinate an...
by noncentral on Monday February 02, 2026 @01:31PM
(#46859450)
For context: RCC is not a proposed fix but a boundary argument.
The claim is that hallucination, drift, and short-horizon collapse arise
from geometric limits of embedded inference — not from insufficient
training or scale.
If someone knows of a theoretical framework that can produce global
consistency from partial, local visibility, I would genuinely like to
compare it against RCC.
Happy to clarify any part of the axioms or implications.
If someone knows of a theoretical framework that can produce global consistency from partial, local visibility, I would genuinely like to compare it against RCC.
Happy to clarify any part of the axioms or implications.