News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Time Machine-style Backups with rsync (2018) by IshKebab on Monday February 02, 2026 @03:18AM (#46853679)
I used to use Borg, but Restic (and it's Rust clone Rustic) are better.
Re:Time Machine-style Backups with rsync (2018) by setopt on Monday February 02, 2026 @07:56AM (#46855498)
Why?

I’m currently trying to decide between Borg and Restic myself. Borg has worked very well for me in the past, and I’m a bit excited by the new Vorta GUI frontend. But I already have a BackBlaze B2 setup for backing up my Mac, and Restic would let me continue to use that as a backup store. I’m interested in hearing about differentiating points between them.

Re:Time Machine-style Backups with rsync (2018) by electroly on Monday February 02, 2026 @08:33AM (#46855859)
Primarily it's the reason you already know: restic and borg are the same model, but restic doesn't need it to be an ssh-accessible filesystem on the remote end. Restic can send backups almost anywhere, including object storage like your Backblaze B2 (that's what I use with restic, too). I agree with OP: restic is strictly better. There's no reason to use borg today; restic is a superset of its functionality.
Re:Time Machine-style Backups with rsync (2018) by stogot on Monday February 02, 2026 @09:38AM (#46856542)
Does restic work well with truenas?
Re:Time Machine-style Backups with rsync (2018) by electroly on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @09:19AM (#46871288)
I don't know specifically, but it's a self-contained single file Go executable. It doesn't need much from a Linux system beyond its kernel. Chances are good that it'll work.
Re:Time Machine-style Backups with rsync (2018) by setopt on Tuesday February 03, 2026 @08:59AM (#46871057)
Thanks! Then I’ll look more at Restic :)