News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Defeating a 40-year-old copy protection dongle by 15155 on Sunday February 01, 2026 @06:04PM (#46850296)
Audience matters. Something intended to stop legitimate business consumers in a non tech industry requires substantially less sophistication than something built to withstand professional reverse engineers.
Re:Defeating a 40-year-old copy protection dongle by dwattttt on Sunday February 01, 2026 @06:15PM (#46850374)
Locks are there to keep honest people honest.

To expand on the saying, they're not there to be insurmountable. Just to be hard enough to make it easier to do things the right way.

Re:Defeating a 40-year-old copy protection dongle by nkrisc on Sunday February 01, 2026 @06:54PM (#46850656)
And often they’re there so no one can plausibly say they didn’t know what they were doing or stumbled into it accidentally. You can’t “accidentally” go through a door with a padlock on it.

I’d guess it’s something similar with this dongle. You can’t “accidentally” run the software without the dongle.

Re:Defeating a 40-year-old copy protection dongle by classichasclass on Sunday February 01, 2026 @06:16PM (#46850381)
Copy protection was also generally less robust for educational software, since it sold to generally law-abiding folks (parents, educators, etc.). Never saw Rapidlok or V-MAX! used for educational software on the Commodore 64, for example.
Re:Defeating a 40-year-old copy protection dongle by Gigachad on Sunday February 01, 2026 @11:00PM (#46852249)
These days there would be an Aliexpress listing selling fake dongles within a month making it easy for the business customers too.