Re:Issue report: You are illegally sharing my fucking book
by DrCatbox on Monday October 22, 2012 @04:37PM
(#4685407)
Yes I can read it.
The argument I was trying to make is to bring attention to the difference between a file and a book, they are different beasts, sure you can read them, but its not the same thiing to read a book and to read from a computer screen or kindle. Its just not the same.
The author has no right decide how I am going to read the book. Its the redistribution which he holds a right to. Lets take the discussion to what form of distribution copyright should apply to. Lets discuss who can decide when to read and how to read a text. Who has the right and who has copyright?
Its not just so simple, oh hey copyright, do as I almighty author say. Where is the consumer-rights in all this debate?
You can read it, yes?
I'm among the first to complain when people conflate "make a digital copy of" and "steal". However, you're going to the opposite extreme - pretending that because it's digital, it has none of the qualities of the original book. You're omitting quite a bit - he (and perhaps his editor) wrote every word in it, chose every image, researched the technology, and typeset the whole thing. Just because it ended up as both a PDF and a printed copy does not diminish the author's labor.
(It certainly diminishes the printer's labor, which is why we raise a stink when printed copies are cheaper than electronic ones.)
But you're hurting the entire ecosystem if you tell authors "stop writing if you don't like it". There's a middle ground somewhere.