Re:A Step Behind the Bleeding Edge: A Philosophy on AI in Dev
by CuriouslyC on Saturday January 31, 2026 @11:42AM
(#46838187)
The routines Olympic champions follow are typically terrible for beginners. Michael Phelps's routine would destroy most swimmers, he has a ton of recovery assistance, he's got the bio mechanics 100% down so he doesn't accrue as much RSI, and he's just genetically gifted with a tolerance for a lot of exercise.
The same pattern holds at the elite levels of most things.
Re:A Step Behind the Bleeding Edge: A Philosophy on AI in Dev
by kranner on Saturday January 31, 2026 @11:45AM
(#46838212)
> The same pattern holds at the elite levels of most things.
How does it hold for writing?
Re:A Step Behind the Bleeding Edge: A Philosophy on AI in Dev
by CuriouslyC on Saturday January 31, 2026 @02:00PM
(#46839618)
Stephen King and Dean Koontz have been getting feedback from people and the market so long that their instincts are razor sharp and they have internalized a structure of stories and what will/wont move readers that they naturally lean on without having to puzzle things out the way a less accomplished writer would.
If you don't have that wisdom, trying to pants something is going to result in writing yourself in circles, contradictions, inconsistencies, incoherence of idea, etc.
The physical (and genetic) demands of athletics aside, we were talking about writing. Just starting on a lark is what worked for Haruki Murakami. Again, it's very unlikely you'll be the next Murakami. But at least you'll improve a lot at something you find interesting! What is the downside here, exactly? Unless you're an opportunity-cost-minimising, industrial-output-maximising kind of person. That's fine, but that's not everyone.