News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by pibaker on Friday January 30, 2026 @05:38PM (#46830946)
This will be an unpopular answer but one way that could have worked is just good ol' advertising, because it directly converts "virality" into income.

Any solution that requires the user to bust out a credit card and put down his billing address has way too much friction for the median user to get through.

Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by wateralien on Friday January 30, 2026 @05:53PM (#46831077)
Unfortunately true.
Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by cyode on Friday January 30, 2026 @08:29PM (#46832363)
I see 16 coffees received. Assuming no private donations for simplicity, that’s $48. As an ads noob, how many sessions would a banner ad need to beat that?
Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by jokethrowaway on Friday January 30, 2026 @08:39PM (#46832443)
My CPM is not great (not Google) and that's 25-30k impressions
Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by addandsubtract on Saturday January 31, 2026 @07:37AM (#46836120)
Doesn't an ad require the user to bust out their credit card eventually?
Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by verdverm on Saturday January 31, 2026 @09:05AM (#46836810)
Yes, nothing happens until you trade a dollar for something, but it does not have to be this site they spend money at.

Advertising isn't even about getting people to open their wallet, it's more about influencing their decision when they do go to spend money or make a purchase.

Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by Philip-J-Fry on Saturday January 31, 2026 @09:18AM (#46836909)
No? Advertising money is paid upfront. X number of impressions. You get paid a cut for hosting the ad. The ad might be a huge failure and lead to zero clickthrough or purchases. But the money has already been paid for the campaign.
Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by spyder on Saturday January 31, 2026 @08:49AM (#46836686)
Yea, but most advertisers come only after something went viral, not when you are building something and you try to say to potential advertiser: "this will go viral trust me bro". And such small viral things are usually short lived, by the time the advertisers come it will probably starts to die down. But yea, maybe he would have got a little more financial support than donations even if he puts up ads after it went viral.

Another way he could benefit from this is when people want his skills to build them similar things, so it's basically already an advertisement for his skills.

Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by pibaker on Saturday January 31, 2026 @03:24PM (#46840447)
This is such a weird comment. Not all advertisement follows the influencer model. Banner ads have been funding small internet operations since before hacker news existed. Do we really don't have long term memories at all?
Re:Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural rend... by Cyphase on Saturday January 31, 2026 @05:30PM (#46841567)
I don't know the terms, but there's what looks like a tasteful ad at the bottom.

> Looking for an architect who builds things that still look great even in November rain? Reach out to classical architect Jorian Egge.