[dead]
Re:In 6 violent encounters, evidence contradicts immigration...
by doobiedowner on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @07:12PM
(#46803743)
If that’s your rationale for soft pedaling shock troops attacking American citizens, yes deeply flawed.
Re:In 6 violent encounters, evidence contradicts immigration...
by 023984398 on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @07:08PM
(#46803702)
The person who murdered Laken Riley was not acting on behalf of the government. That is the difference. Do you see the difference?
Re:In 6 violent encounters, evidence contradicts immigration...
by ModernMech on Thursday January 29, 2026 @10:07AM
(#46811189)
Also that Laken Riley is the only example ever provided for why immigrant violence is such an issue reveals it’s actually not an issue.
Re:In 6 violent encounters, evidence contradicts immigration...
by etchalon on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @07:23PM
(#46803867)
There is plenty of concern for victims of crime. That's why there are jails, and people in the jails.
Re:In 6 violent encounters, evidence contradicts immigration...
by tzs on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @07:15PM
(#46803764)
> Why are such comment downvoted?
Why are you inferring that that comment was downvoted for the 13% of it that you quoted rather than something in the other 87%?
Re:In 6 violent encounters, evidence contradicts immigration...
by cardamomo on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @07:26PM
(#46803891)
You're employing some polarizing language yourself. Calling people "illegals" because of their immigration status demeans them. Beyond that, this language is often used to justify illegal restrictions of their civil rights. Immigrants, regardless of their legal status, have civil rights and human rights.