Re:Will AIs Take All Our Jobs and End Human History–Or Not?
by ef2efe on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @04:51PM
(#46802074)
The end game is nationalisation lmao. How people cant see this is mad...
It wouldnt be the first time in history a govt has taken into their hands an organisation that is deemed too powerful.
Re:Will AIs Take All Our Jobs and End Human History–Or Not?
by funkyfiddler369 on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @05:37PM
(#46802638)
if the government is owned by corporations via the stock markets than governments taking over organisations is privatization via a majority shareholdership and not nationalization.
Re:Will AIs Take All Our Jobs and End Human History–Or Not?
by ef2efe on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @05:40PM
(#46802673)
Are you seriously this delusional? THe leaders of tech firms operate at the behest of Trump. Not the other way round.
Re:Will AIs Take All Our Jobs and End Human History–Or Not?
by funkyfiddler369 on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @06:41PM
(#46803408)
How did Trump get where he is? Who was and is his supply chain? Who made him? Who did he 'use' and 'need' to 'build himself'?
Re:Will AIs Take All Our Jobs and End Human History–Or Not?
by mannanj on Saturday January 31, 2026 @01:15PM
(#46839098)
Yeah I can see that. Though the separation between "govenrment" and "corporation" is pretty thin already. So nationalization or corporitization, whatever you want to call it, its just a label for rich and powerful people concentrating power and deriving benefits.
Re:Will AIs Take All Our Jobs and End Human History–Or Not?
by mannanj on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @05:52PM
(#46802828)
Who funds those tech firms? It's not Trump. His power is mostly theater to his constituents and those who funded Trump: spoiler: he's not entirely self funded, and some of his funding is at least from others so he's conflicted in his self interests to others. We call this a classic conflict of interest.
I think The companies would go out of business if the government did not subsidize them as a matter of public or national security interest. Do you think that would not be the case? It doesn't take much for a company with money to lobby for this and for the power of marketing and mainstream media to make the public perceive this as the right decision - in fact a study of our history would reveal this as the more likely scenario so as a company racing to render the labor market obsolete its in their interest to disrupt it to capture any amount of it.