News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NIST may not have you in mind by pbsd on Sunday October 21, 2012 @12:55PM (#4680057)
Käsper and Schwabe's bitsliced AES [1] does not need very long streams to be fast. It processes 8 blocks simultaneously, not 128 (as a 'pure' bitsliced approach would), and therefore reaches peak performance at relatively small lengths, starting at 128 bytes.

[1] http://cryptojedi.org/papers/aesbs-20090616.pdf

Re:NIST may not have you in mind by agl on Sunday October 21, 2012 @03:25PM (#4680508)
Looks like I haven't been keeping up to date even with my own colleagues' work! Thanks, I'll update the post.