Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by JasonADrury on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @08:11AM
(#46779502)
Huh? "Mossad agents" would by definition not be "Mossad employees"
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by mikkupikku on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @09:38AM
(#46780543)
You've got that backward. Intelligence Agents are employed by intelligence agencies. Intelligence Assets aren't.
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by JasonADrury on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @09:42AM
(#46780604)
I think you're confusing "agent" and "officer".
An agent is specifically some third party acting on your behalf. It's the same when we speak of real estate agents.
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by mikkupikku on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @12:29PM
(#46783212)
Wiktionary says, regarding 'agent':
> Someone who works for an intelligence agency: whether an officer or employee thereof or anyone else who agrees to help their efforts (for ideology, for money, as blackmailee, or otherwise).
That said, I also asked ChatGPT and it says you're right.
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by JasonADrury on Wednesday January 28, 2026 @02:35AM
(#46792192)
I think wiktionary will suffer from the fact that the "incorrect" usage of agent is indeed the more common one. 007 is an agent, even though in real life the MI6 would certainly call him an officer.
"Agent" is a term of art with a rather strict meaning, but that's obviously only true when used in conversations within that specific field.