It is not mind boggling if you don't manipulate quotes to fit for your narrative.

Nice way of avoiding the main question: What deal? There is no new deal between Greenland/Denmark and US.

aaand he never replied

It is like they're brainwashed. Awful.

It is mind boggling how you keep trying to deflect away given your narrative.

> Trump got a standing ovation at Davos and got a deal for Greenland

And you don't know what is the deal, at all, so how can you base your entire argument in something you simply do not know? You don't know, you simply do not know.

I'm confident to go a step further and say there is no deal.

Greenland and Denmark weren't present to make a deal.

And to quote Trump: "Well, the deal is going to be put out pretty soon and we'll see. It's right now a little bit in progress, but pretty far along." (from https://www.youtube.com/shorts/W_UE7h3nTmQ)

The deal that is "now a little bit in progress", sounds to me like there is no deal.

We have.... concepts of a deal.