News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FBI got Hacked, Reveals Hundreds of Passwords by brador on Saturday October 20, 2012 @02:01PM (#4677718)
What's wrong with 3 and 4?

It appears that, in general, the FBI staff are setting reasonable passwords. There are a few passwordNNN types but the majority are adequate and, in my opinion, would hold up well against a brute force vector, which is the primary purpose of password complexity.

Re:FBI got Hacked, Reveals Hundreds of Passwords by simias on Saturday October 20, 2012 @02:18PM (#4677769)
The fact that some of those passwords appear very strong also means they weren't bruteforced and therefore most likely stored in plaintext. I guess even the FBI have sloppy programmers...
Re:FBI got Hacked, Reveals Hundreds of Passwords by espadrine on Saturday October 20, 2012 @02:24PM (#4677793)
They say on the pastebin that one connexion sent passwords in clear text (through asipx-webadmin), so they probably were read there. At least it was probably an entry point.
Re:FBI got Hacked, Reveals Hundreds of Passwords by vibrunazo on Saturday October 20, 2012 @03:03PM (#4677909)
3 and 4 would not take long to be brute forced by a dictionary attack, I think. Too many people use qwerty on their password, so it's probably high rated on a dictionary attack.
Re:FBI got Hacked, Reveals Hundreds of Passwords by nikic on Saturday October 20, 2012 @03:18PM (#4677972)
3 and 4 are weak because we have pretty good heuristics on how passwords are composed so it wouldn't take much longer to brute-force them than it would to do password123.
Re:FBI got Hacked, Reveals Hundreds of Passwords by DanBC on Saturday October 20, 2012 @03:54PM (#4678077)
I'd be interested to see if either 3 or 4 appear on existing password dictionaries.