News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco Graffiti by zahlman on Monday January 26, 2026 @03:36PM (#46771137)
I consider corporal punishment inherently barbaric. An appropriate fine or short stay in jail ought not be life-ruining.

Also, I think there are other effective approaches in some circumstances. People (including "the kids"), locally (Toronto) and other places I've heard of, have been paid (not a super common thing, but it happens) to do actual artwork. There's a mural I consider quite well done, not too far from my place, that isn't getting defaced even though it's in a place where I would otherwise ordinarily expect strong temptation to "tagging" and other graffiti.

Re:San Francisco Graffiti by jjmarr on Monday January 26, 2026 @05:38PM (#46772618)
I've heard real estate people call this legalized extortion, since you have to select a graffiti artist with enough reputation that others don't mess with the piece.
Re:San Francisco Graffiti by alwa on Monday January 26, 2026 @06:24PM (#46773172)
I’ve heard such reputations involve not only the caliber of the art, but also the retributive consequences the artist and friends are thought to impose on people who deface their work…
Re:San Francisco Graffiti by snypher on Monday January 26, 2026 @10:13PM (#46775061)
>real estate people call this legalized extortion

I hope they know what some say of the real estate agent.