Is the maintenance due to code or due to people / politics / etc? LLMs won't change that.
Also it's a formal system and process, "vibe" coding is anything but. Call me curmudgeony (?) but I don't think "vibe coding" should be a phrase used to describe LLM assisted software engineering in large / critical systems.
You don't think the current prices of LLMs will stay?
At some point the investors want to see profit.
> On the contrary, I hope vibe coding revives Linux desktop into a truly usable platform.
Oh sweet summer child.
> Well, LLMs are rapidly reducing development costs to 0.
And maintainance costs along with technical debt rapidly goes up.
e.g. Vibe coding defeats GNOME developers' main argument for endlessly deleting features and degrading user experience - that features are ostensibly "hard to maintain".
Well, LLMs are rapidly reducing development costs to 0.
The bottleneck for UI development is now testing, and here desktop Linux has advantage - Linux users have been trained like Pavlov's dogs to test and write detailed upstream bug reports, something Windows and macOS users just don't do.