Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by alexmonami on Sunday January 25, 2026 @08:52PM
(#46760860)
There are other sources, like this:
https://time.com/7357635/more-than-30000-killed-in-iran-say-...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by vogre on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @02:30AM
(#46776591)
Which also refer to unnamed sources and "U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency"(read CIA)
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by squidbeak on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @05:32AM
(#46778096)
Why lie about this when the first paragraph is explicit about its source?
> As many as 30,000 people could have been killed in the streets of Iran on Jan. 8 and 9 alone, two senior officials of the country’s Ministry of Health told TIME
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by vogre on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @05:43AM
(#46778226)
>two senior officials of the country’s Ministry of Health
And their names are never called.
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by johanyc on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @06:27AM
(#46778577)
It's pretty common practice if naming them will get the people who shared the info in trouble. Depends on whether you think Time is a trustworthy source I guess
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by vogre on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @09:05AM
(#46780058)
Time always was a propaganda leaflet.
Remember "bomb serbs to heel" or "sinister world of saddam"
Re:Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, document...
by pydry on Tuesday January 27, 2026 @10:45AM
(#46781511)
The US paid for similar information from Iraq about WMDs just before it kicked off the invasion.
Meanwhile, the US is rearranging its forces in the middle east. What a coincidence.