News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gaming HN for an Orange Name - A Warning by pg on Thursday February 05, 2009 @04:19AM (#467444)
Hmm. If people take number 6 seriously enough we may be net ahead.
Re:Gaming HN for an Orange Name - A Warning by GavinB on Thursday February 05, 2009 @04:57AM (#467479)
That's a fair point. It wouldn't be much of a hacker site if we didn't run the experiment just to see what happens.

Sadly, I'm betting on "no measurable change."

Re:Gaming HN for an Orange Name - A Warning by unalone on Thursday February 05, 2009 @08:34AM (#467738)
Somebody in the first thread mentioned that he suspected an influx of witty one-liners, since they're easy to read and quickly upvoted. I'm afraid that'll be the case: we'll see a decline in good posts in favor of easily digested posts.
Re:Gaming HN for an Orange Name - A Warning by kalvin on Thursday February 05, 2009 @12:26PM (#468283)
I'm much more likely to read and upvote longer comments, especially when there's lots of comments in a thread, because my eye catches on them and I generally think that if someone wrote a long comment they must have put in some effort.

So if enough people are like me, it won't be the one-liners that benefit.

Re:Gaming HN for an Orange Name - A Warning by Goladus on Thursday February 05, 2009 @08:40AM (#467748)
And maybe not net ahead, if people take #1, #4, and #8 seriously enough.

2, 3, 5 and 7 are all fairly minor, I think.

But 1 and 4 are all about popularity, and number 8 leads to shallow discussion. It seems wrong to me, to assume that anything valuable must be stated within the first two or three exchanges.

Re:Gaming HN for an Orange Name - A Warning by light3 on Thursday February 05, 2009 @08:19PM (#469154)
1- Checked 2- Checked 3- Checked 4- Checked 5- Done 6- Did you know Bill Gates is smelly and likes hamburgers 7. Checked 8. Checked

Bring forth the karma!