News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels by triceratops on Thursday January 22, 2026 @01:37PM (#46723366)
Grid-scale solar installations can be much more decentralized than nuclear or natural gas power plants.

Decentralizing through subsidies at the homeowner level is maybe not the best use of money.

Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels by natmaka on Friday January 23, 2026 @06:55AM (#46731440)
> Decentralizing through subsidies

Consider the lower production cost of renewable electricity: in the long run, it offsets the investment. Bonus: no risk of accidents, no hazardous waste, no dependence on a fuel source, no weapons proliferation...

Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels by triceratops on Friday January 23, 2026 @07:31AM (#46731706)
I didn't say subsidize nuclear. I said subsidize grid-scale solar before rooftop solar.
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels by natmaka on Friday January 23, 2026 @08:20AM (#46732162)
Indeed, sorry.

Decentralizing solar power reduces electricity transmission costs and improves reliability. This doesn't offset the additional cost, but it's not negligible.

Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels by coryrc on Friday January 23, 2026 @10:59PM (#46740927)
If the grid gets heavily overloaded, the frequency and voltage drop. And home-based grid-tie solar will shut itself off when it's most needed. This is fragile and DEcreases reliability.
Re:In Europe, Wind and Solar Overtake Fossil Fuels by natmaka on Sunday January 25, 2026 @10:57AM (#46755180)
Storage, such as batteries coupled with V2G and also green-hydrogen fed turbo-alternators, can alleviate this.