Re:India Is Electrifying Faster Than China Using Cheap Green...
by akshatrathi on Thursday January 22, 2026 @10:20AM
(#46720397)
I wrote this article. Happy to answer any questions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:India Is Electrifying Faster Than China Using Cheap Green...
by alephnerd on Thursday January 22, 2026 @10:24AM
(#46720465)
Any visibility into potential climate financing expansion as part of the upcoming EU-India FTA, especially with regards to CBAM?
Re:India Is Electrifying Faster Than China Using Cheap Green...
by akshatrathi on Thursday January 22, 2026 @11:51AM
(#46721788)
None yet. The EU doesn't have much fiscal capacity. But there are signs that the EU is being forced to get creative and speed things up. The Mercosur deal is a good sign (despite some pending issues).
Re:India Is Electrifying Faster Than China Using Cheap Green...
by alephnerd on Thursday January 22, 2026 @12:24PM
(#46722261)
Fair enough! Long shot as well, but have you heard anything about whether Indian-European JVs will be allowed to take advantage of the EIF Climate Fund and Innovation Fund in the same manner that India-EU defense JVs are expected to take advantage of SAFE (at least according to what some other bureaus were reporting).
Re:India Is Electrifying Faster Than China Using Cheap Green...
by Arnt on Sunday January 25, 2026 @09:50AM
(#46754486)
I'm late to the party. Sorry.
Why do such articles not distinguish between the cheapest and that which is the cheapest? Including this one.
One might reasonably make a long-term policy for new power plants such as "40% of new power from the cheapest source, 20% each from x, y and z". If x is cheapest in a particular year then gets 60%, and articles tend to describe it as if the preference were "60% x, 20% each from y and z", see? Why is that?