Re:eBay Explicitly Bans AI "Buy for Me" Agents in User Agree...
by ryandrake on Wednesday January 21, 2026 @07:49PM
(#46713807)
Exactly. I could put $100,000 as my max bid, but if second place only bids $10, then all they know is I bid $11 (or whatever the increment is). eBay doesn't tell anyone my max is $100K.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:eBay Explicitly Bans AI "Buy for Me" Agents in User Agree...
by krackers on Thursday January 22, 2026 @12:03AM
(#46715541)
I think the reasoning is that people are irrational, and people don't actually have "hard limits' so they will bid in increments to exceed it. So in aggregate you will end up hitting your max more often than if it was a sealed auction.
Re:eBay Explicitly Bans AI "Buy for Me" Agents in User Agree...
by vidarh on Thursday January 22, 2026 @02:21AM
(#46716226)
People also will often have a "hard at the time" limit that turns out to be very soft when they realise other people also wants the same thing.
A bidding war can make the perceived value of an item increase.
Re:eBay Explicitly Bans AI "Buy for Me" Agents in User Agree...
by nutjob2 on Thursday January 22, 2026 @08:09AM
(#46718753)
This is my point. If you look at the actual behavior and read people's comments in forums you'll see that almost no one sticks to their "hard limit". Including me!
People's competitive behavior, or "you're not taking this from me," or "I've definitely got this item and have made plans" or any number of other emotional behaviors take over.
People's railing against sniping also demonstrates this.