News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:International Obfuscated C Code Contest Winners by wtracy on Wednesday October 17, 2012 @10:44PM (#4667248)
Just curious, since you're handy to ask: How do the judges view code that depends on external (but cross-platform and FOSS) libraries? Only Xlib is specifically mentioned in the rules.

I'm specifically thinking of libpng, but I'm sure one could think of other meaningful examples.

Re:International Obfuscated C Code Contest Winners by dlowe on Thursday October 18, 2012 @02:31AM (#4667697)
I don't know the official policy, but anecdotally, I won with an entry that used libperl back in 2000: http://www.ioccc.org/years.html#2000_dlowe
Re:International Obfuscated C Code Contest Winners by Natsu on Thursday October 18, 2012 @06:52AM (#4668197)
I love this bit of history from the hint :)

Aside: history... Larry Wall wrote the original Perl in 1986-87, the same two successive years he won the IOCCC. I hope this program helps you to realize that this was no fluke - that Perl and Obfuscation are as inseparable as, say, camels and humps.

Re:International Obfuscated C Code Contest Winners by wtracy on Thursday October 18, 2012 @02:38AM (#4667710)
The fact that it won for "worst abuse of the rules" doesn't help your point much. :-)
Re:International Obfuscated C Code Contest Winners by ioccc on Wednesday October 31, 2012 @10:23PM (#4725880)
Generally we don't like lots of external dependencies. External libraries do change over time - would such an entry work 10 years from now? The judges do use and test the entries using different operating systems. What will operating systems look like in 10 years?

Having said that :-), if the entry has merit on its own and not just because of the external dependency, then it might "win".