News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Erdos 281 solved with ChatGPT 5.2 Pro by velox_neb on Sunday January 18, 2026 @01:43AM (#46665372)
> It wasn't AI generated.

You're lying: https://www.pangram.com/history/94678f26-4898-496f-9559-8c4c...

Not that I needed pangram to tell me that, it's obvious slop.

Re:Erdos 281 solved with ChatGPT 5.2 Pro by threethirtytwo on Sunday January 18, 2026 @01:50AM (#46665402)
I wouldn't know how to prove to you otherwise other then to tell you that I have seen these tools show incorrect results for both AI generated text and human written text.
Re:Erdos 281 solved with ChatGPT 5.2 Pro by lxgr on Sunday January 18, 2026 @02:52AM (#46665707)
Good thing you had a stochastic model backing up (with “low confidence”, no less) your vague intuition of a comment you didn’t like being AI-written.
Re:Erdos 281 solved with ChatGPT 5.2 Pro by XenophileJKO on Sunday January 18, 2026 @01:54AM (#46665415)
I must be a bot because I love existential dread, that's a great phrase. I feel like they trigger a lot on literate prose.
Re:Erdos 281 solved with ChatGPT 5.2 Pro by lxgr on Sunday January 18, 2026 @02:54AM (#46665726)
Sad times when the only remaining way to convince LLM luddites of somebody’s humanity is bad writing.