News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JuiceFS is a distributed POSIX file system built on top o... by tuhgdetzhh on Thursday January 15, 2026 @05:41PM (#46640449)
If tested various Posix FS projects over the years and everyone has their shortcomings in one way or the other.

Although the maintainers of these projects disagree, I mostly consider them as a workaround for smaller projects. For big data (PB range) and critical production workloads I recommend to bite the bullet and make your software nativley S3 compatible without going over a POSIX mounted S3 proxy.

Re:JuiceFS is a distributed POSIX file system built on top o... by ifoxhz on Thursday January 15, 2026 @08:10PM (#46641788)
I think so.
Re:JuiceFS is a distributed POSIX file system built on top o... by daviesliu on Thursday January 15, 2026 @09:00PM (#46642128)
JuiceFS can be scaled to hundreds of PB by design, also is verified by thousands of users in production [1].

[1] https://juicefs.com/en/blog/company/2025-recap-artificial-in...

Re:JuiceFS is a distributed POSIX file system built on top o... by suavesu on Friday January 16, 2026 @03:12AM (#46644246)
Agree, don't recommend POSIX proxy on S3 for complex workload, like S3FS. In the design of JuiceFS, S3 is like raw disk, JuiceFS metadata engine is like partition table, compare with local file system.