Anthropic Explicitly Blocking OpenCode

Re:Anthropic Explicitly Blocking OpenCode by Aurornis on Thursday January 15, 2026 @01:25AM (#46628788)

You’re making a big assumption. LLM providers aren’t necessarily taking a loss on the marginal cost of inference. It’s when you include R&D and training costs that it requires the capital inputs. They’ve come out and said as much.

The Claude Code plans may not be operating at a loss either. Most people don’t use up 100% of their plan. Few people do. A lot of it goes idle.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anthropic Explicitly Blocking OpenCode by jb_briant on Thursday January 15, 2026 @03:22AM (#46629675)

If you check the actual tokens consumption and compare it to the API you will find a factor 10.

Training models cost tens of millions, their revenues from sub + api are well above hundreds of millions.

If you look at minimax IPO data, you can see that they spent 3x their revenue on "cloud bills".

So yes, it's probable that they do subsidize inference through subscriptions in order to capture market.

No inferrence provider is profitable, and most run on VC money to serve customers.

[ Parent | on HN ]