News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scott Adams has died by pc86 on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @03:34PM (#46607503)
Eyeballs increase ad revenue, just because you're not paying money doesn't mean the artist isn't making money.
Re:Scott Adams has died by retsibsi on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @10:54PM (#46612150)
> Eyeballs increase ad revenue

If you're blocking ads, I think this is usually false. (But I would appreciate a correction if I'm wrong, or more detail if it's complicated.)

Re:Scott Adams has died by KeplerBoy on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @03:26AM (#46613649)
You still increase their algorithmic reach by viewing and interacting with their content. It really is voting with your eyeballs: whether you like or hate the content, if you have it on your screen, the creators benefit.
Re:Scott Adams has died by shiroiuma on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @10:58PM (#46627835)
I disagree: network effects are still present even if you block ads. You tell your friends about it, they tell their friends, etc. Only a small fraction of people bother to block ads (or even know about ad-blocking), so the loss in ad revenue to those people is offset by the gain from their friends seeing the ads.
Re:Scott Adams has died by pc86 on Thursday January 15, 2026 @09:15AM (#46632819)
In addition to the two replies below, which are both accurate, most people don't block any ads.