News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scott Adams has passed away by Arainach on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @01:05PM (#46605041)
They didn't, though. Plenty of people who had one reputation at their death have had that reputation change over time, especially with more information and awareness of what they did. Sometimes their reputations improve, sometimes they decline.

Speaking only positively about people distorts the reality.

Re:Scott Adams has passed away by revnode on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @01:41PM (#46605638)
Why is their reputation relevant? They're dead.

Reputation guides your behavior toward that person. But they're no longer around. There is no behavior toward them. They're gone. Their reputation is no longer relevant.

Re:Scott Adams has passed away by JadeNB on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @01:46PM (#46605728)
> Reputation guides your behavior toward that person. But they're no longer around. There is no behavior toward them. They're gone. Their reputation is no longer relevant.

It also culturally informs someone's perceived suitability as a role model. It doesn't matter to the dead person if they are held in high or low esteem, but it may matter to people in their formative stages deciding whose influence they follow and whose they shun.

Re:Scott Adams has passed away by RajT88 on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @01:59PM (#46605968)
I'm not saying it's right to not "speak ill of the dead". Just that that's the reasoning I've seen in my family.
Re:Scott Adams has passed away by JadeNB on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @02:55PM (#46606877)
I was not weighing in on whether one should or shouldn't speak ill of the dead, only trying to answer:

> Why is their reputation relevant? They're dead.