Re:The world is one bad decision away from a silicon Ice Age
by Kim_Bruning on Monday January 12, 2026 @06:09PM
(#46595457)
I can see why they might not be on your personal list straight away, no. But I bet weapons, logistics, comand&control etc all do need them. So generals and admirals might start sweating just a little.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The world is one bad decision away from a silicon Ice Age
by poulpy123 on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @10:50AM
(#46602558)
In this case it means a shorter war so it would be a net positive
Re:The world is one bad decision away from a silicon Ice Age
by Kim_Bruning on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @11:26AM
(#46603173)
You're leaving a lot unsaid!
Which (sides) is it a net positive for, are you thinking?
Re:The world is one bad decision away from a silicon Ice Age
by poulpy123 on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @11:48AM
(#46603562)
The side that suffer from the war
Re:The world is one bad decision away from a silicon Ice Age
by Kim_Bruning on Tuesday January 13, 2026 @11:56AM
(#46603711)
> The side that suffer from the war
By that logic the defender should always surrender the moment they're attacked, as that would be the most positive outcome.