News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:"Joel Spolksy is wrong about my work" - Kent Beck by DougBTX on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @08:56AM (#465714)
> After the changes, you know there's probably bugs, but you don't know where.

Which highlights one of the "problems" with unit tests: if something fails, you have to take time to go and fix it. If you have no tests, you can assume there are no bugs because you are such a great programmer, then go home after a job well done.

That there actually are bugs there doesn't bother you, because you don't know about them. It takes less time to write buggy code.

Re:"Joel Spolksy is wrong about my work" - Kent Beck by axod on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @09:06AM (#465728)
The alternative, is to build you code in a way which tells you quickly about bugs... decent logging, etc
Re:"Joel Spolksy is wrong about my work" - Kent Beck by swombat on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @09:37AM (#465773)
I do think he was being sarcastic.