News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Poll: What proportion of start-ups/non-start-ups use auto... by jhancock on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @07:07AM (#465635)
I upvoted the first option then realized I needed to upvote all of them. I have and will continue to confirm to each as the situation calls and allows.
Re:Poll: What proportion of start-ups/non-start-ups use auto... by swombat on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @07:27AM (#465649)
Which situations do you think call for "no automated tests"?
Re:Poll: What proportion of start-ups/non-start-ups use auto... by mixmax on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @07:54AM (#465669)
The quick and dirty jobs that we all do every now and then.
Re:Poll: What proportion of start-ups/non-start-ups use auto... by wastedbrains on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @12:28PM (#466069)
Yeah many times when you are 'spiking' and idea you can work through a simple small example fastest without testing. I agree when you are quickly just trying to see if something is possible testing will slow you down, and isn't worth the benefits of TDD.

Then when I start to integrate that solution into real production code I go back and add some tests. (mostly integration tests)

Re:Poll: What proportion of start-ups/non-start-ups use auto... by mikeryan on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @10:23AM (#465839)
These times are when you need automated testing the most.
Re:Poll: What proportion of start-ups/non-start-ups use auto... by mixmax on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @11:27AM (#465930)
I don't really need automated testing tools when I write a small program that I just use myself for some task.

If it works it works, if it doesn't I do it again.