There is now footage from the shooter’s cellphone you can watch, in which you can see the driver hand-over-hand turning away from the shooter while the car is still reversing, before it even starts moving forward. The tires were pointed towards the shooter while it was reversing, which is a movement that moves the front end of the car away from them.
There’s no universe in which she was trying to run him over or would have even come close to touching him if he had taken a step to the right instead of leaning in for a better shot.
Re:Let's Call a Murder a Murder
by metaphysicalyes on Friday January 09, 2026 @02:48PM
(#46558339)
Lets assume you are right. How do you justify the 2nd and 3rd shot from the side window? Very curious how your mind works.
I haven't seen 2nd and 3rd shots from the side window. What video and what time code?
Re:Let's Call a Murder a Murder
by metaphysicalyes on Friday January 09, 2026 @11:43PM
(#46562843)
You claim to have no information about the shots fired yet you assert "I suspect most never watched the video in detail or interpreted it with hindsight."
This kind of asymmetric warfare soliciting unequal effort from others during a discussion is a pattern of troll bots or their human equivalent. I am not willing to engage further if you are unwilling to do a web search.
You made a claim about where the 2nd and 3rd shots were fired from. The onus of proof is on you. If you check my other comments you can see I link to the timecodes in specific videos. FFS I did it two comments up in this thread. You're the one waging "asymmetric warfare".
I would refrain from making any judgment on that because I don't know the intricacies of the law, but it is certainly not "clear" as a lot of people here seem to claim. I suspect most never watched the video in detail or interpreted it with hindsight.