Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by jojobas on Thursday January 08, 2026 @04:26AM
(#46539043)
This equally applies to any investment income wouldn't it? Dividend, loan interest would all be classed as "unearned income" by a certain economic theory I won't name that keeps causing people suffering a century later. Don't do that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by pphysch on Thursday January 08, 2026 @10:36AM
(#46542252)
Predatory loans were maligned as "usury" long before "rent-seeking" or Scary Marxists came along. For good reason. They're bad for society and the economy writ large.
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by jojobas on Friday January 09, 2026 @01:10AM
(#46550610)
Classing all loans as usury help Europe back for a long time.
I guess you could class some rent as predatory as well, allowing others to use your property for a fee is not necessarily predatory (unless you're of "property is theft" kind).
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by gfaster on Thursday January 08, 2026 @05:00PM
(#46547093)
Investment is generally considered profit-seeking behavior (i.e. not rent-seeking). Building an apartment and renting it out is clearly profit-seeking behavior, but if you were continuing to rent it out doing the bare minimum to keep it from falling over 40 years later, that would be pretty clearly rent-seeking.
From this, we can conclude that there must be some point after an investment is made where continuing to benefit from it transitions to rent-seeking behavior.
Re:US will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-fami...
by jojobas on Friday January 09, 2026 @01:13AM
(#46550626)
Would holding some stock 40 year after buying it for dividend also be rent-seeking?
Would rebuilding the apartment every so often straighten you back to profit-seeking?
Rent-seeking is just a meaningless insult if framed like that, it highlights no economically net-negative behaviour.