Re:Creating a bespoke data diode for air‑gapped networks
by wakawaka28 on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @08:33PM
(#46521393)
Eavesdropping on stray RF signals is not so theoretical though. It's been done by NSA and no doubt others. We also need to worry about hardware supply chains including random compromised stuff that "accidentally" leaks or exposes backdoors.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Creating a bespoke data diode for air‑gapped networks
by tripletao on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @09:36PM
(#46521858)
In many industrial applications, the concern is mostly control of the isolated side, like because that could physically destroy stuff. Exfiltration is a smaller or nonexistent concern, since you're already sending most data out deliberately.
So there's still an attack surface, but it's a lot smaller. Any side channel exploit would need to work (at least in some initial form) without changes to the software on the isolated side, since you otherwise can't bootstrap your way to installing it.
Re:Creating a bespoke data diode for air‑gapped networks
by elevation on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @09:16AM
(#46526590)
If I gave away a PC with perfect RF isolation and a rock solid supply chain it wouldn’t improve most user’s overall security because their operational security is so poor. There is no need for any organization to snoop your RF when you’re leaking everything they care about in your metadata.
Re:Creating a bespoke data diode for air‑gapped networks
by wakawaka28 on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @08:50PM
(#46536085)
Intercepting metadata requires a different type of surveillance which may not be possible. The metadata is not at all equivalent to what can be sniffed via RF, which can include your actual keystrokes and the pixels on your screen.