Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers...
by nialv7 on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @06:02AM
(#46510919)
162 to 104 is not 75% reduction... Who calculates reduction percentage like that?!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers...
by roelschroeven on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @11:11AM
(#46514177)
I'm guessing the same kind of people who don't understand the difference between 0.002 dollars and 0.002 cents (http://verizonmath.blogspot.com/2006/12/verizon-doesnt-know-...).
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers...
by llm_nerd on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @11:18AM
(#46514301)
To be fair, they claim the adblock engine saw a 75% reduction in memory usage, and in the images they're showing the main browser process generally (I assume? I don't use Brave), or which the adblock engine is only a part but had a substantial impact on usage.
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers...
by skaul on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @11:53AM
(#46514814)
That is correct.
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers...
by nialv7 on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:36PM
(#46519803)
thanks for the clarification. is this 45MB reduction for the whole browser? or is this 45MB per tab?
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers...
by jonkoops on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @12:49PM
(#46515763)
"Brave has overhauled its Rust-based adblock engine to reduce memory consumption by 75%"
This only claims that the memory usage of the adblock engine was reduced, not the total memory consumption of the browser.