News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers... by nialv7 on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @06:02AM (#46510919)
162 to 104 is not 75% reduction... Who calculates reduction percentage like that?!
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers... by roelschroeven on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @11:11AM (#46514177)
I'm guessing the same kind of people who don't understand the difference between 0.002 dollars and 0.002 cents (http://verizonmath.blogspot.com/2006/12/verizon-doesnt-know-...).
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers... by llm_nerd on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @11:18AM (#46514301)
To be fair, they claim the adblock engine saw a 75% reduction in memory usage, and in the images they're showing the main browser process generally (I assume? I don't use Brave), or which the adblock engine is only a part but had a substantial impact on usage.
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers... by skaul on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @11:53AM (#46514814)
That is correct.
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers... by nialv7 on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:36PM (#46519803)
thanks for the clarification. is this 45MB reduction for the whole browser? or is this 45MB per tab?
Re:Brave overhauled its Rust adblock engine with FlatBuffers... by jonkoops on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @12:49PM (#46515763)
"Brave has overhauled its Rust-based adblock engine to reduce memory consumption by 75%"

This only claims that the memory usage of the adblock engine was reduced, not the total memory consumption of the browser.