Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by wcfrobert on Monday January 05, 2026 @11:43PM
(#46508827)
But isn't living in a stable society, where everyone can find employment, achieve some form of financial security, and not be ravaged by endless rounds of layoffs, more desirable than having net productive co-workers?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by measurablefunc on Monday January 05, 2026 @11:48PM
(#46508845)
You're forgetting that corporations have only one responsibility & it is to make profits for their shareholders.
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by LastTrain on Monday January 05, 2026 @11:59PM
(#46508914)
Whereas a government's responsibility is to ensure peace and prosperity for as many of its citizens as possible. These things will be at odds when increased profits for companies no longer coincides with increased employment.
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by forgetfreeman on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @12:15AM
(#46508994)
You may be overlooking the fact that the US is an oligarchy.
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by nephihaha on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:56AM
(#46510878)
Can you name a present-day country which isn't?
No, not Sweden where 40% of the population have been employed in some way by the Wallenberg family and its corporations in recent times. The other Nordic countries are not as egalitarian as they are presented either.
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by wing-_-nuts on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @12:23AM
(#46509035)
>a government's responsibility is to ensure peace and prosperity for as many of its citizens as possible.
I've never seen the US government behave as if this was a priority. Perhaps things are different in a nordic country?
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by mannanj on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @12:47AM
(#46509140)
Yes. Perhaps the OP was speaking from a dream or a theory standpoint. We know our government in the US has lost its original intent.
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by LastTrain on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:38PM
(#46519829)
Yes, believe it or not some of still believe in this and vote accordingly. Aspirational, as it has always been, with the understanding that we will always fall short.
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by mxkopy on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @12:41AM
(#46509107)
It has been a priority, but only for a certain group of citizens (which only briefly became unfashionable to legislate for explicitly)
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by nephihaha on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:55AM
(#46510867)
A government's main responsibility is to protect and fund itself. All the rest is secondary in real terms. I know it shouldn't be that way.
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by wincy on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @12:52AM
(#46509161)
I’ll make sure to pour one out in memory of all the lamplighters, the stable hands, night soil collectors, and coopers that no longer can find employment these days. These arguments were had 150 years ago with the advent of the railroad, with electricity, with factories and textiles, even if you don’t have net productive coworkers, if there’s a more productive way to do things, you’ll go out of business and be supplanted. Short of absolutely tyrannical top down control, which would make everyone as a whole objectively poorer, how would this ever be prevented?
Re:Why didn't AI "join the workforce" in 2025?
by nephihaha on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @05:52AM
(#46510853)
The difference is that back then we were talking a few jobs here and there. Now we are talking about the majority of work being automated, from accountancy to zoo keeping, and very little in the way of new jobs coming in to replace them.
By the way stable hands and night soil collectors are still around. Just a bit harder to find. We used to have a septic tank that had to be emptied by workmen every so often. Pretty much the same.