Re:X blames users for Grok-generated CSAM; no fixes announced
by biophysboy on Monday January 05, 2026 @04:36PM
(#46505332)
I think it is completely fine for a tech platform to proactively censor AI porn. It is ok to stop men from generating porn of random women and kids. We don't need to get the police involved. I do not think non-consensual porn or CSAM should be protected by free speech. This is an obvious, no-brainer decision.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:X blames users for Grok-generated CSAM; no fixes announced
by mk89 on Monday January 05, 2026 @04:58PM
(#46505587)
Second line of the article.
> X is planning to purge users generating content that the platform deems illegal, including Grok-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
Which is moderating/censoring.
The tool (Grok) will not be updated to limit it - that's all. Why? I have no idea, but it seems lately that all these AI tools have more freedom than us humans.
Re:X blames users for Grok-generated CSAM; no fixes announced
by biophysboy on Monday January 05, 2026 @05:27PM
(#46505953)
An AI porn tool makes the world less free, even with post hoc purges. That is the point.
If you want to be an actress and you are 14 years old, you now have to worry about tools that make porn of you.
If you are an ordinary woman that wants to share photos with your friends on instagram, you now have to worry about people making porn of you!