News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Databases in 2025: A Year in Review by scott_w on Monday January 05, 2026 @05:57AM (#46497374)
Only for large scale multiple user applications. It’s more than reasonable as a data store in local applications or at smaller scales where having the application and data layer on the same machine are acceptable.

If you’re at a point where the application needs to talk over a network to your database then that’s a reasonable heuristic that you should use a different DB. I personally wouldn’t trust my data to NFS.

Re:Databases in 2025: A Year in Review by kunley on Monday January 05, 2026 @06:02AM (#46497411)
What is a "local application"?
Re:Databases in 2025: A Year in Review by loxs on Monday January 05, 2026 @06:08AM (#46497439)
Funny how people used to ask "what is a cloud application", and now they ask "what is a local application" :-)

Local as in "desktop application on the local machine" where you are the sole user.

Re:Databases in 2025: A Year in Review by scott_w on Monday January 05, 2026 @06:46AM (#46497680)
This, though I think other posters have pointed to a web app/site that’s backed by SQLite. It can be a perfectly reasonable approach, I think, as the application is the web server and it likely accesses SQLite on the same machine.
Re:Databases in 2025: A Year in Review by kunley on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @04:19AM (#46510264)
That commenter's idea clearly wasn't about desktop application on a local machine. That is why I asked.
Re:Databases in 2025: A Year in Review by scott_w on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @08:45AM (#46512137)
You mean Andrew's comment? I took it in the broadest sense to try and give a more complete answer.