News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPv6 just turned 30 and still hasn't taken over the world by morshu9001 on Friday January 02, 2026 @06:54PM (#46471014)
Part of the ipv6 ambition was fixing all the suboptimally allocated ipv4 routes. They considered your idea and decided against it for that reason. But had they done it, we would've already been on v6 for years and had plenty of time to build some cleaner routes too.

I think they also wanted to kill NAT and DHCP everywhere, so there's SLAAC by default. But turns out NAT is rather user-friendly in many cases!

Re:IPv6 just turned 30 and still hasn't taken over the world by cylemons on Saturday January 03, 2026 @03:11AM (#46473915)
What do you mean by suboptimal allocation?
Re:IPv6 just turned 30 and still hasn't taken over the world by _ikke_ on Saturday January 03, 2026 @08:29AM (#46476370)
The ipv4 routing table contains many individual /24 subnets that cannot be summarized, causing bloat in the routing tables.

With ipv6, that can be simplified with just a couple of /32 or /48 prefixes per AS.

Re:IPv6 just turned 30 and still hasn't taken over the world by morshu9001 on Saturday January 03, 2026 @12:52PM (#46479467)
This, because a bunch of random /24s were sold off to different ISPs, because of address scarcity.