Re:Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter
by insin on Friday January 02, 2026 @06:28PM
(#46470798)
This is damage-as-a-service, free of charge and as anonymous as your account, plus automatic distribution of the results to the victim and for all to see.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter
by maxerickson on Friday January 02, 2026 @06:32PM
(#46470828)
Right, who is swinging the hammer? Is it the user that asks for it to be swung or is it the thing that responds by swinging?
Re:Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter
by insin on Friday January 02, 2026 @06:50PM
(#46470984)
Do we really need the bad analogy at all?
Re:Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter
by maxerickson on Friday January 02, 2026 @07:08PM
(#46471134)
No.
But if someone uses one, it can make sense to illustrate that it doesn't apply as cleanly as they think.
Re:Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter
by jmye on Friday January 02, 2026 @11:53PM
(#46472934)
I dunno, I think a significant amount of fault lies with the developers who were either too stupid and too bad at software to create a tool that couldn’t create CSAM, or were too vile to enable the restriction.
I also think people who defend that kind of software are in dire need of significant introspection.