News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Concurrent Hash Table Designs. Parent comment

Re:Concurrent Hash Table Designs by the-smug-one on Wednesday December 31, 2025 @06:36AM (#46443319)
I don't see the problem at all, tbh. Both `get(K); put(K);` and `put(K); get(K);` are valid execution traces on a uniprocessor.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Concurrent Hash Table Designs by mrkeen on Friday January 02, 2026 @01:51PM (#46468032)
Oh yeah, I'm not sure what an execution trace is, but ConcurrentHashMap is indeed fit-for-purpose for single-threaded use.
[ Parent | on HN ]