Re:US federal appeals court reverses Galaxy Nexus sales ban
by stock_toaster on Thursday October 11, 2012 @03:13PM
(#4642256)
I found that a bit confusing as well. I wonder if the court was saying that a ban was inappropriate, and instead the remedy should have been something like a fine for every device sold that infringed (until such infringement was removed)?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US federal appeals court reverses Galaxy Nexus sales ban
by stephengillie on Thursday October 11, 2012 @03:18PM
(#4642281)
A big point seems to be that people buy neither an iPhone nor a Galaxy Nexus specifically for their search abilities, regardless of how much Apple wanted to advertise Siri in court.
Re:US federal appeals court reverses Galaxy Nexus sales ban
by stock_toaster on Thursday October 11, 2012 @03:25PM
(#4642306)
> A big point seems to be that people buy neither an iPhone nor a Galaxy Nexus specifically for their search abilities
I agree.Assume infringement of something, lets say a patented chemical in particular competitors dog food. If the court claims it is not a 'causal nexus' (people don't buy the dog food for the chemical), and that if preventing the competitor from selling the dogfood was not appropriate (no causal nexus) then I guess the remaining "relief" would be entirely monetary?
If the infringement continued after a finding, maybe it would become willful at some point meaning higher fines?
> , regardless of how much Apple wanted to advertise Siri in court.
I don't see how this portion of your comment is relevant.
Re:US federal appeals court reverses Galaxy Nexus sales ban
by Karunamon on Thursday October 11, 2012 @03:43PM
(#4642401)
Because Siri is Apple's answer to search on an iPhone, or at least thats's how I interpreted it.
Re:US federal appeals court reverses Galaxy Nexus sales ban
by bdcravens on Thursday October 11, 2012 @06:24PM
(#4643096)
iOS has had unified search prior to Siri. (iOS 3)